Misc blog.
How to kill human rights by using a trick.
Published on January 10, 2006 By XX In US Domestic
Wow! I love Bush! I loved how he went for Saddam with "evidence" for WMD.

**Ignore this part***USA economies is falling like a rock and gas prices is flying like airplane on it's takeoff.*** I was tired and made a mistake on this part.

Now with great works like those, and support for Bush on it's fatal plunge, it appears that Bush is apparently working really hard... to make his approval rate as close to zero as possible.

Apparently, this law was added to a "must-pass" bill, and as a result, it was passed into law. We really should do something about it and get rid of a major human rights loss. Ability to "annoy" everyone is a right for everyone. I don't mean harassment or something like that. II mean something like criticism and negative comments. Not only that, it states that you MUST do it with real name in account information! Being anonymous while posting "annoying" news, comments or criticism is scary part of human rights! Sometimes being anonymous is best way to reveal some serious crimes such as corruption without paying for it with life or something like that.

It's bad that the term is very ambiguous. It leave a lot of room for prejudiced judges to put "certain" people in jail. Or simply hack it and put people in jail or not depending on the mood. It can range from simply a little thing such as different view on something up to harassment. Now, harassment IS breaking law. But... being annoying or being annoyed happens every day, if not each minute. Well. We better build MUCH bigger jails or simply let other kind of criminals with minor crimes.

However, this is NOT end of it. There is one other problem we really have to take of. The problem is it was possible because of one thing: the "parasite" law inside barely or completely unrelated bill. An example: If we are passing a bill to improve parks, why do it contain a law that adds probation of junk food from school? How is those related at all? How do we fix this? I have a possible solution.

Well two possible solutions anyway...

1: Make sure ALL bills has only ONE law added, removed, or modified. No other law is added, removed, or modified.

2: Make sure ALL bills' laws IS completely related to each other, such as law for banning for junk food in school and law to add new healthy snacks.

This is dangerous thing to simply let governments pull this trick off again, again, till there is no human rights.

Comments
on Jan 10, 2006
This is dangerous thing to simply let governments pull this trick off again, again, till there is no human rights.


Um, they do this crap all the time, and with things that would blow your mind (for example, sticking some stuff about drilling in Alaska on with stuff for funding the military...Dems have the choice of either voting for the Alaska thing or not sending the needed money to the military).

I don't see that this is really Bush's fault, and further, can you imagine how LONG it would take if they were to try to sort and organize the bills into little same-topic packets? Nothing would ever get addressed in a timely manner (haha, as if it does now).

Curious if you read all the contents of the bill?

Anyways, I don't really have a solution, but I agree that's somewhat unethical to package unpopular bills inside necessary and timely proposed legislation.
on Jan 10, 2006
I don't see that this is really Bush's fault, and further, can you imagine how LONG it would take if they were to try to sort and organize the bills into little same-topic packets? Nothing would ever get addressed in a timely manner (haha, as if it does now).


They do it under the Westminster system, but then again it's fairly different in organisation; ie the Minister for Tasty Snacks will have the Department of Tasty Snacks working for him to prepare legislation. It means that riders just don't happen; a defence bill can only have defence added to it, a tasty snack bill tasty snack-related laws added, and even then only with the agreement of the government that wrote those laws.

I doubt you guys would ever be willing though to have the same kind of government as England, Australia and - the horror- the Canadians though, so I suppose you'll just have to keep an eye out.
on Jan 10, 2006
Bush works in Congress? And all this time I thought he worked in the White House.
on Jan 10, 2006
the Minister for Tasty Snacks will have the Department of Tasty Snacks working for him


!!! this is the best sentence have heard in about a week. I want to start a quote book just so that I can write that one down!

I don't know why I like it so much...
on Jan 10, 2006
USA economies is falling like a rock and gas prices is flying like airplane on it's takeoff.


Obviously you don't live in the U.S. The economy is doing very well.

I forgot, reality doesn't matter as long as you hate Bush.
on Jan 10, 2006
Ummm... President Bush does not write legislation. He approves legislation.

Please see "Separation of Powers" in any textbook or online reference regarding the US Constitution and the way the US Government works.

Um, they do this crap all the time, and with things that would blow your mind

Truer words never spoken. And usually a congressional bill's riders have political machinations behind them.

Dems have the choice of either voting for the Alaska thing or not sending the needed money to the military

Their opponents can then cite the time when Rep Snuffy voted against little old ladies receiving their retirement benefits and omit the part about the rider which would have authorized the pumping of all lakes, rivers, and stream water into the Los Angeles Coliseum or some such nonsense.

BTW, to say that this is All Bush's Fault (note the capital letters) is to say that... okay, well, people claim everything bad in America or the world is ABF. How sad that you have joined that bandwagon.
on Jan 10, 2006
USA economies is falling like a rock and gas prices is flying like airplane on it's takeoff.


Hmm, the Dow just went over 11k for the first time in four years.

Gas prices here are hovering around $2.10/gal. (down from the $3.49 high during the Katrina cluster-fuck.)

Oh, and I'm pulling down $44k/yr. with bonusues.

*listens for that rock falling*

I think you're a couple years too late on this breaking news.

(Still don't like Bush though.)

-- B
on Jan 10, 2006
Bush Bashing will eventually become a new sport, kinda like XFL.
on Jan 10, 2006
Gotta hand it to people like XX, Col and BenUser. They get more and more creative as time passes by and things get better. If they could only use these abilities to nit-pick to make their own lives better.
on Jan 10, 2006
USA economies is falling like a rock and gas prices is flying like airplane on it's takeoff.


I'll admit that was wrong. It was pretty late at that time. My apologies everyone.

Ummm... President Bush does not write legislation. He approves legislation.

Exactly. I should have lay part of blame of writing the bill to congress, but Bush had to approve it for it to become a bill.
on Jan 10, 2006
I should have lay part of blame of writing the bill to congress

Yes, good so far...

but Bush had to approve it for it to become a bill.

The word you're looking for is LAW. Bush has to approve it before it becomes a LAW. By the time it comes to GWB to be signed, it has already passed through and been approved by sub-committees, committees, House, and Senate.

I recommend "Schoolhouse Rock". "I'm Just a Bill" is an excellent introduction to the lawmaking process.
on Jan 10, 2006
DUH Yeah I HAVE seen that show too. Many years ago, but yeah. I meant LAW.

Thanks.

DJBandit, Check out my blog. Not exactly rant monger most of time.
on Jan 10, 2006
Good to see you here, XX (XXX's little bro'?) thanks for the information - good stuff.